The series of final exams for eleventh graders is over. Schoolchildren have already passed exams in all subjects, and this has closed the main period of delivery.
The average score in Russia on the Unified State Exam in the Russian language in 2017 was 69.06. Statistical calculations of this year's results are still ongoing.
Until 2017, the right to retake the USE was granted only to persons who did not overcome the minimum threshold in compulsory subjects, on the delivery of which the receipt of a certificate depends. One of the important innovations in 2017 was the ability to retake any subject submitted to the exam.
Thus, in 2018 it will be possible to get a second attempt in the Russian language, mathematics, physics, computer science, literature, chemistry, biology, geography, social studies, history or foreign languages.
It is important to take into account the following facts:
- You can retake only 1 exam.
- You can now try to retake an item twice.
- You can retake one subject if there is a good reason (documentary evidence is required) or at will (in order to increase the score, it will be possible to retake the exam next year).
- Previous graduates who took part in the preliminary or main session of the USE-2018 and received an unsatisfactory score do not receive the right to retake.
- If a graduate is not allowed to retake in 2018, he can re-take the USE in a year.
The results of the exam in the Russian language 2018 are already known
The Unified State Exam in Russian is one of the compulsory subjects for delivery at school. On Wednesday, June 6, 2018, graduates of Russian schools took an exam in the Russian language. Along with mathematics, Russian is necessary for passing not only for admission, but also for obtaining a certificate.
The examination sheet for the Russian language contained 26 tasks. The student was given three and a half hours to solve these tasks. It was necessary to try and score at least 36 points for admission to the university. To receive a school certificate, an eleventh grader had to earn 24 points.
The Federal Service for the Supervision of Education and Science has summed up the preliminary results of the Unified State Exam in the Russian language, which was held during the main exam date on June 9.Almost 617 thousand people took part in the exam. The average USE score in the Russian language in 2017 is comparable to last year's result.
The minimum threshold for obtaining a certificate of 24 points was not crossed by 0.5% of the exam participants (in 2016, their number was 1%).
“This year the trend of improving results in compulsory subjects continues. The share of graduates who were left without certificates decreased by almost 1.5 times, and this is not taking into account the results of the upcoming retakes. These results testify to the success of the project "I will pass the Unified State Exam" and are the result of serious targeted work that was carried out with lagging schoolchildren in the regions and municipalities, where the USE results of past years revealed serious problems with the level of school education, "said the head of Rosobrnadzor Sergei Kravtsov.
The minimum threshold of 36 points, below which universities cannot set the passing score of the USE in Russian for applicants, was not able to overcome 1.6% of the participants. In 2016, the number of USE participants in the Russian language who did not overcome this threshold was 2.5%.
Thanks to large-scale implementation new technology scanning of participants' papers at the examination points (PES); checking the papers and processing the results of the exam in the Russian language was completed ahead of schedule. Exam participants will be able to find out their result five days earlier - from June 22 ..
Graduates of the current year who could not get the minimum score on the Unified State Exam in Russian, but received a positive result on the Unified State Exam in Mathematics, who could not get the minimum score on the Unified State Exam in Russian, will be able to retake the Russian language in the reserve deadline for passing the Unified State Exam - June 29.
The page contains the USE results in all subjects for past years - from 2010 to the present. The tables show the average score for each of the subjects, the number of 100-point students, the percentage of those who did not pass the exam (who did not overcome the threshold established for the subject), and the total number of those who passed the exam.
The material was prepared based on the official releases of Rosobrnadzor.
Unified State Exam Results 2019
| Thing | Average score | High-scores (81-100) | 100-point | Did not pass the exam 2018,% | The number of those who passed the exam |
| Russian language | (threshold 24 points) | 662 000 | |||
| Math Profile | (threshold of 27 points) | 367 000 | |||
| Math base | (threshold 3 points) | 312 000 | |||
| Social science | |||||
| Physics | |||||
| Story | (threshold 32 points) | 120 000 | |||
| Biology | |||||
| Chemistry | (threshold 36 points) | 97 500 | |||
| English language | |||||
| Informatics and ICT | |||||
| Literature | (threshold 32 points) | 54 000 | |||
| Geography | (threshold 37 points) | 24 000 | |||
| German | |||||
| French | |||||
| Spanish language | |||||
| Chinese | 289 | ||||
| Total: |
Almost 750 thousand people were registered to participate in the main period of the USE-2019, of which 662 thousand are graduates of the current year. During the main period of the Unified State Exam, 5,713 examination points (PES), about 51 thousand audiences will be involved. All PPEs will use the technology of printing examination materials in classrooms, in 8 regions, for the first time this year, the technology of transferring examination materials to the PPE via the Internet.
- Since 2019, graduates have the right to choose only one level of the Unified State Exam in mathematics (basic or specialized) for passing, but this level may be changed upon retaking.
- Since 2019, graduates of previous years are not eligible to participate in the USE in basic mathematics.
- The popularity of natural science subjects has grown. So, in 2019, the growth in the number of USE participants in biology was 25 thousand compared to last year, in chemistry - about 16 thousand, in physics - about 13 thousand participants. Also, in comparison with 2018, the level of interest in computer science and ICT has noticeably increased (an increase in the number of participants by 27 thousand people), English language(an increase of 18 thousand people) and history (an increase of 15 thousand).
- In 2019, the USE in the Chinese language will be held for the first time, 289 people applied for participation in it.
- The USE in a foreign language is planned to be included in the number of compulsory subjects from 2022. This will be preceded by the necessary preparatory work, approbation, discussion of how best to differentiate the exam according to the level of difficulty.
- From 2020, it may be possible to take the exam in computer science on a computer.
Unified State Exam Results 2018
| Thing | Average score | High-scores (81-100) | 100-point | Did not pass the exam 2018,% | The number of those who passed the exam |
| Russian language | 70,93 | 26,7% | 3722 (0,6%) | 0.4% (threshold 24 points) | 645 500 |
| Math Profile | 49,8 | 145 (0,03%) | 7% (threshold of 27 points) | 421 000 (61%) | |
| Math base | 4,29 | - | - | 3.1% (threshold 3) | 567 000 |
| Social science | 16.43% (threshold 42 points) | 368 000 (53%) | |||
| Physics | (threshold 36 points) | 171 500 (25%) | |||
| Story | 56,9 | 206 (0,002%) | 9.6% (threshold 32 points) | 112 000 (20%) | |
| Biology | 45 (0,03%) | 17.01% (threshold 36 points) | 140 000 (21%) | ||
| Chemistry | 60 | 634 (0,75%) | 15.88% (threshold 36 points) | 84 500 (14%) | |
| English language | 15 (0,02%) | (threshold 22 points) | 83 500 | ||
| Informatics and ICT | 58,5 | 13% | 254 (0,4%) | 11.51% (threshold 40 points) | 67 000 |
| Literature | 599 (1%) | (threshold 32 points) | 55 000 | ||
| Geography | 56,5 | 64 (0,4%) | 7.3% (threshold 37 points) | 16 000 | |
| German | 3 (0,2%) | (threshold 22 points) | 1 758 | ||
| French | 2 (0,2%) | (threshold 22 points) | 948 | ||
| Spanish language | (threshold 22 points) | 153 | |||
| Total: | 6 136 | 731 000 |
Exams in 2018 were taken by 731,000 people (in the main period - 670,000), including 645,000 graduates of the current year.
- Graduates who did not score the minimum threshold scores on the compulsory USE (basic mathematics and Russian) can retake the exam in the same year on a reserve day. If it didn't work out again, then in September.
- If USE participants find mobile devices or cribs, they are removed from the exam without the right to retake this year.
- Elective subjects can only be retaken the next year. In 2018, 478 people were removed from the exam for phones, 463 for cribs. "This year there were several guys who used earpieces, and the camera was not on the phone, but on their clothes. All these graduates were removed from exams without the right to retake. ", - said the head of the quality assessment department general education Rosobrnadzor Igor Kruglinsky.
- When applying to a university, you can use any result that has not expired.
- The results of the exam do not affect the mark in the certificate.
- A notable event of the Unified State Exam-2018 was the fact of which Rosobrnadzor did not recognize.
- The number of 100 points increased by 1000 in comparison with the previous year.
- One participant from Moscow passed four subjects for 100 points at once.
USE results 2017
| Thing | Average score | Number of 100 points | Did not pass the USE 2017,% | Number of Dealers | |
| Russian language | 68,7 | 25,04% | 3 099 | 0.5% (threshold 24 points) | 617 000 |
| Math Profile | 47,1 | 4,51% | 224 | 14.34% (threshold of 27 points) | 391 981 |
| Math base | 4,24 | - | - | 3.4% (threshold 3 points) | 453 000 |
| Social science | 55,4 | 4,46% | 142 | 13.8% (threshold 42 points) | 318 000 |
| Physics | 53,2 | 4,94% | 278 | 3.78% (threshold 36 points) | 155 281 (24%) |
| Story | 56,9 | 8.7% (threshold 32 points) | 110 000 | ||
| Biology | 52,6 | 6,54% | 75 | 18% (threshold 36 points) | 111 748 |
| Chemistry | 60 | 15% (threshold 36 points) | 74 000 | ||
| English language | 70,1 | 59 | (threshold 22 points) | 64 422 | |
| Informatics and ICT | 59,1 | 9.3% (threshold 40 points) | 53 000 | ||
| Literature | 59,68 | 343 | 2.9% (threshold 32 points) | 41 267 | |
| Geography | 55,1 | 8,6% | 9.3% (threshold of 37 points) | 14 000 | |
| German | 63,74 | 24,56% | 0 | 3.36% (threshold 22 points) | 1 769 |
| French | 75,89 | 50,81% | 0 | 0.43% (threshold 22 points) | 1 123 |
| Spanish language | 68,33 | 38,04% | 0 | 6.75% (threshold 22 points) | 231 |
| Total: | 5 026 | 703 000 |
About 703 thousand people took part in the exams, of which about 617 thousand people are graduates of the current year.
- Those who did not get the minimum score in one compulsory subject were allowed retake the exam on a reserve day... 12 thousand people went to retake mathematics of the basic level in the reserve period. On a reserve day, 2,000 graduates retried mathematics of the profile level.
- There are quite a lot of 100 points in Russian... For example, in the Vologda region there are 27 such people, in the Krasnoyarsk region - 61, in the Chelyabinsk region - 76, in the Novosibirsk region - 89.
- 21 people managed to recruit 300 points for the exam in 2017. This means that they received 100 points on three examinations.
- The number of attempts to cheat or smuggle a phone to an exam in 2017 decreased by 25 percent on average. In one of the regions, a school director was fired for trying to help students in the exam. In another, the teacher was fired because he came to the exam with a mobile phone.
The total number of violations this year has decreased by more than one and a half times compared to the previous year.
In 2017, as in 2016, the most popular elective subjects were social studies (chosen by 54% of the USE participants), physics (26%), history (21%), biology (20%), chemistry (13%).
USE results 2016
| Thing | Average score | The number of high-scores (81-100) | Number of 100 points | Did not pass the USE 2016,% | Number of Dealers |
| Russian language | 68 | 25,58% | 3433 | 1% | 658 000 |
| Math Profile | 46,2 | 2,69% | 296 | 15,33% | 439 229 |
| Math base | 4,15 | - | - | 4.6% (threshold 3 points) | 453 000 |
| Social science | 53,1 | 3,11% | 59 | 17.6% (threshold 42 points) | 382 000 |
| Physics | 50,0 | 6.11% (threshold 36 points) | 180 000 | ||
| Story | 16% (threshold 32 points) | ||||
| Biology | 52 | 7,16% | 61 | 18.6% (threshold 36 points) | 126 006 |
| Chemistry | 84 000 | ||||
| English language | 69,78 | 27 | 64 050 | ||
| Informatics | 56,6 | 12.4% (threshold 40 points) | |||
| Literature | 57,91 | 256 | 4.3% (threshold 32 points) | 43 585 | |
| Geography | 13% (threshold 37 points) | ||||
| German | 66,76 | 32,77% | 1 | 3,29% | 1 980 |
| French | 73,62 | 42,31% | 6 | 1,25% | 1 273 |
| Spanish language | 74,59 | 49,65% | 2 | 2,8% | 204 |
300 points on three exam in 2016, only three students were recruited throughout Russia. Mikhail Chekanov from Olenegorsk, Murmansk Region, passed physics, specialized mathematics and computer science with the highest marks. A graduate from Kemerovo Elizaveta Shabanova received 100 points on the Unified State Exam in Russian language, history, social studies. In Kirov, a graduate of the famous Physics and Mathematics Lyceum, Alexander Artemyev, passed physics, computer science and mathematics for 100 points and entered Phystech.
Quantity deletions there were about a thousand graduates with the exam in 2016, while schoolchildren began to use paper cheat sheets more often.
Unified State Exam Results 2015
| Thing | Average score | The number of high-scores (81-100) | Number of 100 points | Did not pass the exam 2015,% | Number of Dealers |
| Russian language | 65,8 | 19,8% | 3036 | 1,5% | |
| Math Profile | 45,6 | 521 151 | |||
| Math base | 3,95 | - | - | 7,4% | |
| Social science | 58,6 | 371 200 | |||
| Physics | 51,4 | 159 500 | |||
| Story | 47,1 | 145 000 | |||
| Biology | 53,6 | 122 936 | |||
| Chemistry | 57,1 | ||||
| English language | 64,9 | 61 946 | |||
| Informatics and ICT | 54 | ||||
| Literature | 57,1 | 5.3% (threshold 32 points) | 37 512 | ||
| Geography | 53 | ||||
| German | |||||
| French | |||||
| Spanish language |
In total, 725 thousand people took part in the exam, of which 650 thousand people are graduates of the current year. The total number of staff in all subjects in 2015 was 3,922 people.
In 2015, the exam in mathematics was for the first time held at two levels - profile and basic. The exam participant had the right to independently choose any of the levels, or both levels, depending on their educational needs, as well as the prospects for continuing education.
Unified State Exam Results 2014
| Thing | Average score | Number of 100 points | Did not pass the exam 2014,% | Number of Dealers |
| Russian language | 62,5 | 2385 | 4% | |
| Mathematics | 46,4 | |||
| Social science | 53,1 | |||
| Physics | 45,7 | 16,7% | ||
| Story | 46,4 | 20,4% | ||
| Biology | 54,8 | |||
| Chemistry | 55,7 | 13,4% | ||
| English language | 61,3 | |||
| Informatics and ICT | 57,2 | 11,5% | ||
| Literature | 54,1 | |||
| Geography | 53,1 | 15,5% | ||
| German | ||||
| French | ||||
| Spanish language |
In total, 733,368 people took part in the exam, of which 684,574 people are graduates of the current year. The total number of staff in all subjects in 2014 was 3,705 people.
- The number of those who did not pass the compulsory subjects (Russian language and mathematics) in 2014 decreased by 24% compared to 2013.
- The number of 100 points decreased by three times.
- This year the minimum score for the compulsory subjects has been lowered. If this had not happened, 28,000 students would not have received their certificates.
Unified State Exam Results 2013
| Thing | Average score | Number of 100 points | Did not pass the USE 2013,% | Number of Dealers |
| Russian language | 63,9 | 2531 | 1,9 | 834020 |
| Mathematics | 48,7 | 538 | 6,2 | 803741 |
| Social science | 59,5 | 84 | 481990 | |
| Physics | 53,5 | 474 | 11,0 | 208875 |
| Story | 54,8 | 500 | 11,0 | 164219 |
| Biology | 58,6 | 466 | 7,1 | 162248 |
| Chemistry | 67,8 | 3220 | 7,3 | 93802 |
| English language | 72,4 | 581 | 3,3 | 74668 |
| Informatics | 63,1 | 563 | 8,6 | 58851 |
| Literature | 457 | 5,6 | 44420 | |
| Geography | 57,2 | 193 | 12,1 | 20736 |
| German | 58,6 | 4 | 3,2 | 2768 |
| French | 69,5 | 5 | 0,5 | 1561 |
| Spanish language | 68,9 | 0 | 1,7 | 233 |
Unified State Exam Results 2012
| Thing | Average score | Number of 100 points | Did not pass the exam 2012,% | Number of Dealers |
| Russian language | 61,5 | 1923 | 2.2% (threshold 36 points) | 827529 |
| Mathematics | 45,2 | 54 | 5.5% (threshold 24 points) | 803913 |
| Social science | 55,5 | 84 |
5.8% (threshold 39 points) |
455942 |
| Physics | 47,3 | 44 | 13.5% (threshold 36 points) | 205988 |
| Story | 52,1 | 219 | 12.4% (threshold 32 points) | 153502 |
| Biology | 54,3 | 46 | 8.1% (threshold 36 points) | 159448 |
| Chemistry | 57,8 | 370 | 10.8% (threshold 36 points) | 89529 |
| English language | 61,2 | 28 | 3.3% (threshold 20 points) | 71825 |
| Informatics | 60,7 | 364 | 11.6: (threshold 40 points) | 59646 |
| Literature | 337 | 4.9% (threshold 32 points) | 42102 | |
| Geography | 56,1 | 66 | 8.4% (threshold of 37 points) | 23523 |
| German | 58,0 | 1 | 3,2 | 2970 |
| French | 67,1 | 0 | 0,7 | 1621 |
| Spanish language | 70,4 | 1 | 0,8 | 265 |
Unified State Exam Results 2011
| Thing | Average score | Number of 100 points | Did not pass the exam 2011,% | Number of Dealers |
| Russian language | 60,02 | 1437 | 4,1 | 760618 |
| Mathematics | 47,49 | 205 | 4,9 | 738746 |
| Social science | 57,11 | 23 | 3,9 | 280254 |
| Physics | 51,54 | 206 | 7,4 | 173574 |
| Story | 51,2 | 208 | 9,4 | 129354 |
| Biology | 54,29 | 53 | 7,8 | 144045 |
| Chemistry | 57,75 | 331 | 8,6 | 77806 |
| English language | 61,19 | 11 | 3,1 | 60651 |
| Informatics | 59,74 | 31 | 9,8 | 51180 |
| Literature | 57,15 | 355 | 5 | 39317 |
| Geography | 54,4 | 25 | 8 | 10946 |
| German | 48,99 | 2 | 6,6 | 2746 |
| French | 62,97 | 0 | 1,2 | 1317 |
| Spanish language | 70,09 | 0 | 1,4 | 143 |
The number of those who took the Unified State Exam in comparison with 2010, the number of graduates who took the Unified State Exam, in 2011 decreased from 850 thousand to 720 thousand (by 15%).
Unified State Exam Results 2010
The table contains the results of passing the exam in 2010 throughout Russia.
| Thing | Number of applicants | Did not pass the exam 2010,% | Number of 100 points | The number of those who passed who did not start part C,% |
| Russian language | 901929 | 3,7 | 1415 | 5,4 |
| Mathematics | 854708 | 6,1 | 160 | 38,81 |
| Social science | 444219 | 3,9 | 34 | 3,01 |
| Physics | 213186 | 5 | 114 | 32,32 |
| Story | 180900 | 9 | 222 | 12,08 |
| Biology | 171257 | 6,1 | 133 | 8,51 |
| Chemistry | 83544 | 6,2 | 275 | 11,27 |
| English language | 73853 | 5 | 2 | 5,51 |
| Informatics | 62652 | 7,2 | 90 | 22,33 |
| Literature | 54313 | 5 | 422 | 1,69 |
| Geography | 22256 | 6,3 | 17 | 14,06 |
| German | 4177 | 12 | 0 | 10,06 |
| French | 1883 | 1 | 0 | 4,99 |
In total, there were 836,565 graduates in 2010. This figure is slightly lower than the total number of those who took the exam, due to retakes of graduates of previous years.
The Unified State Exam in Russian is a compulsory exam. In total, 616 590 people took part in the main period of the USE in the Russian language in 2017 (in 2016 - 658 392 people; in 2015 - 672 407 people).
The results of the USE in the Russian language in 2017 are generally comparable with the results of the USE of previous years.
On the official website of the FIPI, in the section "Analytical and methodological materials", "Methodological recommendations for teachers, prepared on the basis of an analysis of typical mistakes of participants in the USE 2017" are published, it is here that you can find information about what is the average USE score in the Russian language was in 2017.
Download the document.
Table 1
Average USE score in Russian 2015 - 2017
| Year | Average test score | Test score range | ||||
| 0–20 | 21–40 | 41–60 | 61–80 | 81–100 | ||
| 2017 | 69,06 | 0,43% | 2,62% | 23,61% | 48,30% | 25,04% |
| 2016 | 68,5 | 0,82% | 3,40% | 24,45% | 45,75% | 25,58% |
| 2015 | 66,16 | 1,69% | 4,79% | 26,98% | 46,75% | 19,80% |
The share of examinees who scored 100 points based on the exam results remained unchanged compared to 2016 - 0.5%. The share of high-scorers also remains stable: 25.5% in 2016 and 25% in 2017.
In 2017, the proportion of graduates who did not overcome the minimum threshold (who did not receive the minimum (24) test score) decreased by 0.5%: from 0.99% (2016) to 0.54% (2017). The main reasons for the decrease in the share of such participants in the Russian language can be attributed to the successful implementation of the Rosobrnadzor system of measures to improve the quality of teaching the Russian language in the regions. Russian Federation... Data on changes in the number and proportion of 100-point students in 2015–2017. are given in table. 2.
table 2
Statistics on the performance of the work as a whole and of individual tasks allows us to identify the main problems in the preparation of examinees in the Russian language. As in previous years, the sections of the course related to the formation of communicative competence remain insufficiently mastered. Insufficiently developed skills of analytical work with word and text, lack of sufficient practice in the analysis of linguistic phenomena also affect the quality of writing an essay-reasoning. Graduates experience the greatest difficulties when applying punctuation and spelling norms in writing.
The site "Teach in School" presents an interesting article Average USE score 2017 in Russian, based on other data from the Internet.
Svetlana Gaisina,
Strange reasoning about a subject in which the author is not that he has not figured out, but simply has no idea ... indeed, in the author's position there is neither justice, nor the previous level of journalistic education, even the logic is absent in the presentation. How can the worst be among the best? Evaluation criteria for all alone, experts do not see any names or schools where graduates study, and part of the work is evaluated by experts from other regions. And university teachers check the work of the Unified State Examination on a par with teachers. Strange article.
I'm afraid you haven't figured everything out or you don't know everything. The weak are really drawn out. Not without it. Here is a story a former relative told me. He went to enroll in a university on a paid department with a shortage. Several adults gathered, whose school results soured (more than 5 years). All of them were brought into the classroom and handed out kims and answers in three subjects at once. It was only necessary to carefully rewrite the numbers and scribble something in the composition. Based on this bizarre exam, a relative was admitted to college. And God would be with him, whoever was accepted, let him be taught. But after all, these points are recorded somewhere, and on the trail. year you can go with them to a decent university.
Svetlana Gaisina,
Strange reasoning about a subject in which the author is not that he has not figured out, but simply has no idea ... indeed, in the author's position there is neither justice, nor the previous level of journalistic education, even the logic is absent in the presentation. How can the worst be among the best? Evaluation criteria for all alone, experts do not see any names or schools where graduates study, and part of the work is evaluated by experts from other regions. And university teachers check the work of the Unified State Examination on a par with teachers. Strange article.
Marina Sukhoterina,
Svetlana Gaisina,Strange reasoning about a subject in which the author is not that he has not figured out, but simply has no idea ... indeed, in the author's position there is neither justice, nor the previous level of journalistic education, even the logic is absent in the presentation. How can the worst be among the best? Evaluation criteria for all alone, experts do not see any names or schools where graduates study, and part of the work is evaluated by experts from other regions. And university teachers check the work of the Unified State Examination on a par with teachers. Strange article.
Not weird. I was on a test in my subject. Some moments amazed and alarmed me (was not this year)Someone checks about 45 works in just a day, for example. Afraid to do it wrong. He has only these 45 works. And he can, after reading everything, return to the best of this pile, put the score higher. Although, it really shouldn't have been done.
Another checks as many as 120 jobs a day. Diagonally. With a disgruntled face. (they are forced to be experts!).
The third one is just honestly checking. He is an ordinary teacher, without titles and shoulder straps, he just honestly pulls the strap ...
As for university students, let them check, sit on the exam, and so on
I think they will soon get tired of it, especially against the background of the scandals sounded, from which the bureaucrats got out of the water!
Oksana Gorbacheva,
Marina Sukhoterina,Svetlana Gaisina,Strange reasoning about a subject in which the author is not that he has not figured out, but simply has no idea ... indeed, in the author's position there is neither justice, nor the previous level of journalistic education, even the logic is absent in the presentation. How can the worst be among the best? Evaluation criteria for all alone, experts do not see any names or schools where graduates study, and part of the work is evaluated by experts from other regions. And university teachers check the work of the Unified State Examination on a par with teachers. Strange article.
Not weird. I was on a test in my subject. Some moments amazed and alarmed me (was not this year)Someone checks about 45 works in just a day, for example. Afraid to do it wrong. He has only these 45 works. And he can, after reading everything, return to the best of this pile, put the score higher. Although, it really shouldn't have been done.
Another checks as many as 120 jobs a day. Diagonally. With a disgruntled face. (they are forced to be experts!).
The third one is just honestly checking. He is an ordinary teacher, without titles and shoulder straps, he just honestly pulls the strap ...
As for university students, let them check, sit on the exam, and so on
I think they will soon get tired of it, especially against the background of the scandals sounded, from which the bureaucrats got out of the water!
AND? No matter how one expert checks the work, it is still checked by the second one; if there is a difference of 2 or more points, the work is automatically sent for 3 checks. Finally, you can appeal.The experts DO NOT KNOW which class and which student was writing the work.
It is a pity that the teachers' council is engaged in populism.
Checks are often subjective!
Marina Sukhoterina,
Oksana Gorbacheva,Marina Sukhoterina,Svetlana Gaisina,Strange reasoning about a subject in which the author is not that he has not figured out, but simply has no idea ... indeed, in the author's position there is neither justice, nor the previous level of journalistic education, even the logic is absent in the presentation. How can the worst be among the best? Evaluation criteria for all alone, experts do not see any names or schools where graduates study, and part of the work is evaluated by experts from other regions. And university teachers check the work of the Unified State Examination on a par with teachers. Strange article.
Not weird. I was on a test in my subject. Some moments amazed and alarmed me (was not this year)Someone checks about 45 works in just a day, for example. Afraid to do it wrong. He has only these 45 works. And he can, after reading everything, return to the best of this pile, put the score higher. Although, it really shouldn't have been done.
Another checks as many as 120 jobs a day. Diagonally. With a disgruntled face. (they are forced to be experts!).
The third one is just honestly checking. He is an ordinary teacher, without titles and shoulder straps, he just honestly pulls the strap ...
As for university students, let them check, sit on the exam, and so on
I think they will soon get tired of it, especially against the background of the scandals sounded, from which the bureaucrats got out of the water!
AND? No matter how one expert checks the work, it is still checked by the second one; if there is a difference of 2 or more points, the work is automatically sent for 3 checks. Finally, you can appeal.The experts DO NOT KNOW which class and which student was writing the work.
It is a pity that the teachers' council is engaged in populism.
It's useless to talk! There is no smell of populism here!
Checks are often subjective!
Explain. Seriously.
Oksana Gorbacheva,
Marina Sukhoterina,Oksana Gorbacheva,Marina Sukhoterina,Svetlana Gaisina,Strange reasoning about a subject in which the author is not that he has not figured out, but simply has no idea ... indeed, in the author's position there is neither justice, nor the previous level of journalistic education, even the logic is absent in the presentation. How can the worst be among the best? Evaluation criteria for all alone, experts do not see any names or schools where graduates study, and part of the work is evaluated by experts from other regions. And university teachers check the work of the Unified State Examination on a par with teachers. Strange article.
Not weird. I was on a test in my subject. Some moments amazed and alarmed me (was not this year)Someone checks about 45 works in just a day, for example. Afraid to do it wrong. He has only these 45 works. And he can, after reading everything, return to the best of this pile, put the score higher. Although, it really shouldn't have been done.
Another checks as many as 120 jobs a day. Diagonally. With a disgruntled face. (they are forced to be experts!).
The third one is just honestly checking. He is an ordinary teacher, without titles and shoulder straps, he just honestly pulls the strap ...
As for university students, let them check, sit on the exam, and so on
I think they will soon get tired of it, especially against the background of the scandals sounded, from which the bureaucrats got out of the water!
AND? No matter how one expert checks the work, it is still checked by the second one; if there is a difference of 2 or more points, the work is automatically sent for 3 checks. Finally, you can appeal.The experts DO NOT KNOW which class and which student was writing the work.
It is a pity that the teachers' council is engaged in populism.
It's useless to talk! There is no smell of populism here!
Checks are often subjective!
Explain. Seriously.
I am reading scans of works.
That's all the explanation.
Everything!
Marina Sukhoterina,
Oksana Gorbacheva,Marina Sukhoterina,Oksana Gorbacheva,Marina Sukhoterina,Svetlana Gaisina,Strange reasoning about a subject in which the author is not that he has not figured out, but simply has no idea ... indeed, in the author's position there is neither justice, nor the previous level of journalistic education, even the logic is absent in the presentation. How can the worst be among the best? Evaluation criteria for all alone, experts do not see any names or schools where graduates study, and part of the work is evaluated by experts from other regions. And university teachers check the work of the Unified State Examination on a par with teachers. Strange article.
Not weird. I was on a test in my subject. Some moments amazed and alarmed me (was not this year)Someone checks about 45 works in just a day, for example. Afraid to do it wrong. He has only these 45 works. And he can, after reading everything, return to the best of this pile, put the score higher. Although, it really shouldn't have been done.
Another checks as many as 120 jobs a day. Diagonally. With a disgruntled face. (they are forced to be experts!).
The third one is just honestly checking. He is an ordinary teacher, without titles and shoulder straps, he just honestly pulls the strap ...
As for university students, let them check, sit on the exam, and so on
I think they will soon get tired of it, especially against the background of the scandals sounded, from which the bureaucrats got out of the water!
AND? No matter how one expert checks the work, it is still checked by the second one; if there is a difference of 2 or more points, the work is automatically sent for 3 checks. Finally, you can appeal.The experts DO NOT KNOW which class and which student was writing the work.
It is a pity that the teachers' council is engaged in populism.
It's useless to talk! There is no smell of populism here!
Checks are often subjective!
Explain. Seriously.I am reading scans of works.
That's all the explanation.
I disagree with many points, especially the essay.
Everything!
The points did not meet the criteria?
Have you filed an appeal? Results?